1. Introduction

Foreign direct investment has become the single most consequential external variable in Cambodia’s post-pandemic growth model. The Council for the Development of Cambodia (CDC) approved roughly US$5.1 billion in FDI in 2025, a 16 percent increase on 2024, and the pace continued into the first half of 2026 (Khmer Times, 2026). Yet the composition of this inflow is a source of legitimate policy concern: China alone accounted for 73.7 percent of 2025 FDI value, and independent analysis has questioned whether the volume of newly approved projects is translating into diversified, higher-value investment rather than short-cycle, low-skill manufacturing concentrated in a handful of provinces (East Asia Forum, 2025). Against this backdrop, the ease, transparency, and predictability of company incorporation is not a peripheral administrative matter – it is one of the few levers Cambodian policymakers can adjust unilaterally, quickly, and without fiscal cost, in contrast to infrastructure or macroeconomic levers that take years to move.

This article addresses two questions relevant to that policy debate. First, how does Cambodia’s incorporation regime for foreign investors compare, procedurally and substantively, with its ASEAN peers as of 2026? Second, given that comparison, which specific reforms to Cambodia’s incorporation, licensing, and investment-facilitation architecture are most likely to widen the country’s investor base – geographically and sectorally – over the 2026-2028 horizon, a period in which several regional competitors are simultaneously liberalising their own regimes.

2. Country-by-Country Analysis

2.1 Singapore

Singapore remains the ASEAN benchmark for incorporation speed and ownership liberality. A Private Limited Company (Pte Ltd) permits 100 percent foreign shareholding with no minimum local ownership, a nominal S$1 paid-up capital requirement, and incorporation via the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority’s (ACRA), typically completed within one to three business days once a licensed corporate service provider has filed on the investor’s behalf (ACRA, 2026; Statrys, 2026). The principal friction point for foreign founders is not ownership but residency: every company must appoint at least one director who is ordinarily resident in Singapore, commonly satisfied through a nominee-director arrangement. Since June 2025, nominee-director status has been placed on a central ACRA register, and 2026 amendments have tightened beneficial-ownership disclosure requirements economy-wide (Vivos, 2026). Singapore’s competitive advantage for Cambodia’s policy comparison lies less in any single procedural rule and more in the compounding effect of speed, legal certainty, and a globally trusted registrar.

2.2 Malaysia

Malaysia’s Companies Commission (Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia, SSM) permits 100 percent foreign ownership of a Sendirian Berhad (Sdn Bhd) in most sectors, with the exception of finance, telecommunications, oil and gas, education, and distributive trade, where sector-specific equity caps or licensing apply (Malaysia4U, 2026). Statutory paid-up capital is nominal at RM1, but the Immigration Department’s Expatriate Services Division informally requires RM500,000 to RM1,000,000 in paid-up capital before it will sponsor an Employment Pass for a foreign director, a de facto capital floor that substitutes for a formal minimum-capital rule (Moore BZI, 2026). Incorporation through the MyCoID portal is typically completed in three to seven business days. A licensed company secretary must be appointed within 30 days, and beneficial-ownership register updates are mandatory within 14 days of any ownership change under the Companies (Amendment) Act 2024 (Horizon Hub Consulting, 2026).

2.3 Thailand

Thailand presents the most restrictive baseline among Cambodia’s larger ASEAN competitors. The Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) caps foreign equity at 49 percent in most service, retail, and professional activities unless the investor secures a Foreign Business License, Board of Investment (BOI) promotion, or relies on the US-Thailand Treaty of Amity (available only to US nationals and US-incorporated entities). From 1 January 2026, all private-company registrations moved to the mandatory digital DBD Biz Regist platform, and a new Department of Business Development order (Order No. 1/2569, effective 1 April 2026) introduced enhanced scrutiny of Thai shareholders’ source of funds to curb nominee arrangements (Global Law Experts, 2026a). In a partially offsetting liberalising move, the Thai cabinet approved the removal of ten previously restricted business categories from the Foreign Business Act’s annexes in 2026, a change expected to take effect in mid-to-late 2026 (Lex Bangkok, 2026). The net 2026 direction is therefore mixed: selective sectoral opening alongside tighter enforcement against ownership circumvention.

2.4 Vietnam

Vietnam’s regime is defined by a two-certificate structure – the Investment Registration Certificate (IRC) and the Enterprise Registration Certificate (ERC) – historically issued in sequence, with the IRC first. The Law on Investment No. 143/2025/QH15, effective 1 March 2026, introduced an “ERC-first” option that allows a foreign investor to incorporate the legal entity before the investment project itself is approved, provided the IRC procedure is completed within twelve months (Acclime Vietnam, 2026). Vietnam applies a negative-list approach: any sector not explicitly listed as prohibited, restricted, or conditional is open to 100 percent foreign ownership, with no general statutory minimum charter capital outside specific licensed sectors. Under Decree 96/2026/ND-CP, IRC processing has been shortened to approximately ten working days, and ERC issuance typically follows within three to seven days (IVLF Lawyer, 2026). Vietnam attracted approximately US$36.6 billion in FDI commitments in 2024, the third-highest in ASEAN behind Singapore and Indonesia, underscoring that procedural liberalisation has accompanied, rather than substituted for, industrial-policy scale (Indochina Link, 2025).

2.5 Indonesia

Indonesia implemented the single most significant capital-threshold liberalisation of the 2025-2026 cycle. Under BKPM Regulation No. 5 of 2025, effective 2 October 2025, the minimum paid-up capital for a foreign-owned limited liability company (PT PMA) was cut by 75 percent, from IDR 10 billion to IDR 2.5 billion (approximately US$150,000), while the broader investment-plan threshold of IDR 10 billion per KBLI business-classification code was retained (Cekindo, 2026a). Registration proceeds through the Online Single Submission Risk-Based Approach (OSS-RBA) system administered by BKPM, typically taking four to eight weeks including notarial deed preparation, Ministry of Law approval, and tax and business-identification-number registration. Sector access continues to be governed by the Positive/Priority Investment List under Presidential Regulation 10/2021, and the reduced capital carries a twelve-month lock-up restricting fund transfers out of the corporate account (Emerhub, 2025). Indonesia’s reform illustrates that a large, sector-diverse economy can lower its capital floor sharply while retaining a KBLI-based sectoral screening architecture – a combination directly relevant to how Cambodia calibrates its own QIP minimum-capital thresholds.

2.6 Philippines

The Philippines’ Foreign Investments Act (Republic Act 7042, as amended by RA 8179 and RA 11647) permits up to 100 percent foreign ownership of domestic-market enterprises outside the Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL), subject to a standard minimum paid-in capital of US$200,000, reduced to US$100,000 where the enterprise involves advanced technology or employs at least fifty direct staff (Respicio & Co., 2026). Export enterprises deriving 60 percent or more of output from exports face no minimum capitalisation. The 13th Regular FINL, promulgated under Executive Order No. 113 (2026) and effective 2 May 2026, widened foreign participation in several previously capped sectors, while the Retail Trade Liberalization Act reduced the minimum paid-up capital for foreign retailers from US$2.5 million to PHP 25 million – roughly US$450,000 (Business Law Update, 2026). Registration for foreign-equity entities proceeds through the Securities and Exchange Commission’s eSPARC platform but requires capital verification absent from the faster, purely domestic OneSEC track, extending practical processing to two to four weeks.

2.7 Cambodia

Cambodia’s regime rests on two parallel tracks. Standard company incorporation proceeds through the Ministry of Commerce’s CamDX single-window platform, which since Prakas 117 (effective 8 January 2026) integrates the Ministry of Commerce, the General Department of Taxation, and the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training in one filing sequence (KPMG, 2026). A private limited company can be 100 percent foreign-owned with no statutory minimum capital outside regulated sectors – in practice, a declared capital of roughly US$1,000 (KHR 4,000,000) is common – and no requirement for a Cambodian director or shareholder except in land-holding and a short list of restricted activities such as gemstone processing, rice milling, and cigarette manufacturing (Emerhub, 2026; Making It Easy Cambodia, 2026). Registration is typically completed within seven to twenty-one working days, with the Ministry of Commerce targeting eight to ten working days for its own review stage.

Investors seeking fiscal incentives – profit-tax holidays of up to nine years or an accelerated-depreciation alternative, customs-duty exemptions on capital goods, and VAT exemptions on production inputs – must separately register as a Qualified Investment Project (QIP) with the Council for the Development of Cambodia (CDC) or, for projects under US$5 million, the Provincial-Municipal Investment Sub-Committee (PMIS), under the 2021 Law on Investment and its implementing Sub-Decree 139. QIP status requires minimum capital, typically from US$100,000 depending on sector and location, and is granted or refused within twenty working days of a complete application (VDB-LOI, 2024; Emerhub, 2025). Cambodia’s Negative List, rather than a general foreign-ownership cap, governs which activities are ineligible for QIP incentives or for majority foreign ownership altogether.

Cambodia’s headline liberality – no statutory minimum capital for ordinary incorporation and unrestricted foreign ownership in the great majority of sectors – compares favourably even against Singapore and Malaysia on paper. The gap with regional competitors lies less in the letter of the law than in three implementation dimensions: the bifurcation between MOC incorporation and CDC/PMIS incentive registration, which requires investors to navigate two distinct one-stop mechanisms rather than one; the comparative youth and lower international familiarity of the CamDX and QIP online platforms relative to Singapore’s BizFile+ or Indonesia’s OSS-RBA; and reputational risk associated with governance and rule-of-law perceptions, which independent commentary has linked to elevated due-diligence friction for investors from outside China (Cambodia Investment Review, 2026).

2.8 Laos, Myanmar, and Brunei

Laos abolished minimum registered-capital requirements for most foreign investors in 2017 and permits full foreign ownership in encouraged sectors under its Investment Promotion Law (2024) and Enterprise Law (2023), though joint ventures remain preferred or required in sensitive industries; digital filing remains partial, extending to e-commerce licensing only as of the 2026 E-Trust platform (Tilleke & Gibbins, 2026). Myanmar’s incorporation framework, administered by the Directorate of Investment and Company Administration under the 2016 Myanmar Investment Law, continues to be constrained less by statutory design than by the post-2021 political and banking crisis, currency-conversion controls, and elevated sanctions-related due-diligence burdens that have made it a marginal comparator for mainstream FDI decisions since 2021. Brunei permits full foreign ownership in most non-oil sectors, imposes no statutory minimum capital for private companies, and offers digital registration through Business.gov.bn, but its narrow non-hydrocarbon investor base limits its relevance as a direct Cambodia competitor. None of the three is treated as a primary benchmark in the recommendations below, but each illustrates a variant of the same regional trend: capital-threshold liberalisation proceeding faster than institutional and digital-infrastructure modernisation.

3. Comparative Summary Table

Table 1 summarises the seven-jurisdiction comparison against the six benchmarking criteria described in Section 2.

Country	Foreign Ownership	Minimum Capital	Registration Authority	Statutory Timeline	Digital Filing	2026 Direction of Travel
Singapore	100% in nearly all sectors	S$1 nominal (S$50k-100k practical for EP)	ACRA (BizFile+)	1-3 business days	Fully digital, CSP-mediated for foreigners	Tightening beneficial-ownership/nominee transparency; otherwise stable
Malaysia	100% in most sectors (Companies Act 2016)	RM1 nominal (RM500k-1m practical for Employment Pass)	SSM (MyCoID)	3-7 business days	Fully digital (MyCoID)	Steady liberalisation; e-invoicing and beneficial-ownership compliance rising
Thailand	Capped at 49% outside FBL/BOI/Treaty of Amity routes	THB 2-3 million for restricted-list foreign firms	DBD (Biz Regist)	Digital filing; FBL 2-4 months	Mandatory digital DBD Biz Regist since Jan 2026	Cautious opening – 10 categories delisted in 2026, but nominee enforcement intensified
Vietnam	Negative-list system; 100% where not restricted	No statutory minimum; sector/project-dependent	DPI (IRC) + Business Registration Office (ERC)	IRC ~15 working days; ERC 3-7 days	eID-based digital filing from 2026	Law on Investment 2025 introduces ERC-first sequencing, faster IRC (10 days)
Indonesia	100% in most KBLI codes; Negative/Priority List applies	IDR 2.5 billion paid-up (cut from IDR 10bn in 2025); IDR 10bn investment plan per KBLI	BKPM via OSS-RBA	4-8 weeks	Fully digital (OSS-RBA)	Capital threshold cut 75% in Oct 2025 – most significant ASEAN liberalisation of the cycle
Philippines	Up to 100% outside the Negative List (RA 11647)	US$200,000 (US$100,000 with tech/employment conditions)	SEC (eSPARC)	2-4 weeks for foreign-equity entities	Digital (eSPARC/OneSEC for domestic; slower for foreign)	13th FINL (2026) widens open sectors; retail capital cut from $2.5m to ~$450k
Cambodia	100% in nearly all sectors (2021 Law on Investment; Negative List)	No statutory minimum for standard LLC; QIP threshold from US$100,000	MOC (CamDX) for incorporation; CDC/MPISC for QIP	MOC: 7-21 days; QIP: 20 working days	CamDX single-window (MOC, GDT, MLVT)	Prakas 117 (2026) modernises registration; QIP one-stop-service is the main FDI lever

Table 2. Secondary comparators (Laos, Myanmar, Brunei).

Country	Foreign Ownership	Minimum Capital	Registration Authority	Statutory Timeline	Digital Filing	2026 Direction of Travel
Laos	100% permitted in encouraged sectors; JV preferred/required in sensitive sectors	Minimum capital requirement abolished for most foreign investors (2017)	Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MOIC)	Weeks; paper and emerging digital tracks coexist	Partial – E-Trust platform (2026) for e-commerce only	Enterprise Law 2023 and Investment Promotion Law 2024 continue gradual modernisation
Myanmar	Sector-dependent under Myanmar Investment Law; foreign equity caps in some activities	No uniform statutory minimum; MIC-approved projects vary by sector	Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA)	Variable; political and banking instability lengthens timelines	Partially digital (MyCO)	Post-2021 instability, currency controls, and sanctions exposure continue to deter FDI
Brunei	100% permitted in most non-oil sectors under Companies Act	No statutory minimum for private companies	Ministry of Finance and Economy / Darussalam Enterprise	Days to weeks depending on sector licensing	Digital via Business.gov.bn	Diversification drive beyond oil and gas continues but investor base remains narrow

Note. Compiled by the author from the primary and secondary sources cited in Sections 3 and the reference list. Capital figures are approximate US-dollar equivalents at prevailing 2026 exchange rates and are illustrative rather than legally binding conversions.

3. Conclusion

Cambodia’s incorporation regime is, on paper, among the most liberal in ASEAN: full foreign ownership is available in nearly every sector, there is no general statutory minimum capital for ordinary company registration, and the 2021 Law on Investment provides internationally recognisable investor protections. The comparative gap with Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Indonesia is not primarily one of legal permissiveness but of process integration, published performance transparency, and institutional credibility – precisely the dimensions that determine whether a prospective investor without an existing Cambodia-based network chooses to proceed.

Cam Accounting & Tax Service Co., Ltd., a member firm of Kreston Global, holding a GDT tax agent license, Accounting, Auditing, and liquidator licenses from ACAR, and accredited by the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) and Trust Regulator (TR).

For more information, please contact our Accounting, Tax and Audit Expert

Ms. Haing Sivtieng, MIPA, MBA
Partner
Chinese Line: +855 89 777 589
English line: +855 93 33 5158

Mr. Keat Heng, ACCA, CPA, FCCA
Partner
Mobile: +855 12 753 257
E-mail : info@krestoncambodia.com
Website: www.krestoncambodia.com